01743 298100
enquiries@geosmartinfo.co.uk
GeoSmart Information
  • Home
  • Reports
    • Contaminated Land Reports
    • Flood Risk Assessments
    • Sustainable Drainage Reports
    • Detailed Drainage Design
  • Data & Services
    • Groundwater Flood Risk Map
    • SuDS Infiltration Map
    • BGS Geology Datasets
    • User Guides
    • GWFlood
    • GWSewerFlood
    • Flood Risk Portfolio
  • Risk
    • FloodSmart Analytics
    • Case Studies
    • News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Contaminated Land
    • Flood Risk Assessment
    • Sustainable Drainage Systems
    • Groundwater Flood Risk
    • CPD
    • Videos
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
    • Library
    • Case Studies
    • Latest GeoSmart e-Newsletters
  • About
    • Our Customers
    • Our Team
    • Our Partnerships
    • Testimonials
    • Careers
    • Our Responsibility
    • A Sustainable Future
    • FAQs
  • Contact

House of Lords urge more proactive SuDS guidance

Posted on February 26th 2016 in Blog, Climate change, Flooding, Groundwater Flood Forecasting

In the second of two consecutive blogs, we summarise the key outputs from the House of Lords National Policy for the Built Environment Committee meeting. Turning to the impact of climate change, the committee was fully behind the need for a more proactive approach to the provision of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

The Committee cited The Government’s decision not to implement Schedule 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010, which would have established a separate approval regime for SuDS in new developments, as a key area for criticism by witnesses.

This decision means that any SuDS provision will now be considered directly through the planning system, risking its implementation in cases where developers may raise questions over cost and seek to negotiate out of such provision.

The Construction Industry Council was highly critical of the decision, telling the Committee that the decision had created voids in policy, uncertainty in planning policy interpretation, the abandonment of the concept of drainage as “critical infrastructure”, no structure for the adoption and maintenance of SuDS, and no measures to address flood resilience at a local scale.

From submissions made at the Committee, they recommended that the Government takes a more proactive approach to the provision of Sustainable Drainage Systems.

They further recommended that the Government consider whether to introduce a separate approval regime, as was envisaged in the Flood and Water Management Act 2010, or whether to upgrade the status of Sustainable Drainage Systems to critical infrastructure.

Further efforts need to be made to increase flood resilience in the built environment and to look at how SuDS could be retrofitted, together with other individual property measures.

With over 240,000 properties in England currently located in areas of high flood risk, and 1,500 homes a year being built each year in areas that are currently designated as high flood risk, there is an essential need to act as climate change events grow ever more severe.

They cited the Committee on Climate Change, who observed that progress in managing surface water flood risk had been slow in urban areas, and that surface water flooding was likely to increase in future with increased paving over of front gardens, infill development and an ageing public sewer network.

The Committee urged taking steps to reduce the number of new properties built in areas of flood risk against Environment Agency advice. In addition, there should be a requirement for all new properties in flood risk areas to have flood resilience measures built in. The Government should also promote a co-ordinated programme of retrofit for the growing number of existing properties in such areas.

The advocacy for a more robust SuDS regime, managed by Planning Authorities with more mandation lies at the heart of real change here. Also, incentivising homeowners to implement resilience measures and obtaining financial benefit (e.g. insurance cost reductions) would also be a powerful step. This final point wasn’t picked up in the Committee but feels like a natural step, especially if Flood Re does not stay as policy forever.

  • Read our first blog on this report – House of Lords puts weight behind brownfield first policy.
  • Find out more on the House of Lords National Policy for the Built Environment Committee report.
Posted by DavidKempster
Share this Post
« Previous Post
Next Post »

Contact Us

  • Please choose the product(s) you would like further information on.
  • If possible please give as much information about your site / property as you can and attach a site plan if available. This will enable us to provide you with the best assistance.
  • (If available)
  • Please upload your file in PDF format. (Max 4MB)
    Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: pdf, Max. file size: 4 MB.
    • Hidden
    • Hidden

    See what our customers have to say...

    "During the conveyancing process for my current house purchase, I was extremely concerned to find the general search results revealed the house was at 'moderate risk of groundwater flooding'. I was unable to get any further information from anyone until I contacted GeoSmart. The staff I spoke to were friendly, helpful, efficient and extremely knowledgeable. The information provided was very site specific and focused. The staff member who talked me through the information and maps provided was very knowledgeable, answered all my questions and allowed me plenty of time to discuss issues. Thanks to GeoSmart for their great service."
    Linda Barton
    "We were impressed by the speedy, well-informed service and personal contact that we received. The report was thorough and comprehensive. We will certainly use GeoSmart's services in the future"
    Gregory Gray
    Gregory Gray Associates
    "I would like to say that dealing with GeoSmart was a seamless experience from beginning to end - thank you for that"
    Martin Lloyd
    Martin Lloyd Associates
    "Everyone involved from initial approach to receipt of report was knowledgeable, efficient and focused"
    Robert McCall
    OeMO Ltd
    "Great service! Extremely fast and the report was very detailed and well received by the planners. Many thanks GeoSmart, we will definitely use your services again"
    Nigel Slack
    Michael Eyres Partnership LLP
    "The service was great, fast and efficient. Everyone we talked to was very helpful and the details were well received by the planners"
    Ben Thorns
    Solid Digital Marketing Ltd
    "The service for a Phase 1 Contaminated Land Study was excellent, fast and efficient! GeoSmart were willing to assist despite the extremely tight timescale to work with. We will definitely consider using your services again"
    Craig Roberts
    Hunter Page
    "Efficient and friendly service, GeoSmart provided a clear and concise report within the timescales advised. Great service and I would have no problem recommending"
    Geraint Harris
    Vitec Consult
    "We are very pleased with the service provided by GeoSmart. Their reports have been used to assist with numerous planning applications and have always been delivered to budget and on-time, much to our clients’ appreciation. We look forward to working with GeoSmart on future projects"
    Alan Gunne-Jones
    Planning & Development Associates
    "The service provided was efficient and friendly. From the first phone call to GeoSmart they provided a clear, professional approach to my request within the timescales advised. Great service and I would have no problem recommending"
    John Childs
    Private Developer
    Find out more about how we can support you today!
    Get in touch
    Subscribe to our newsletter
    © 2022 GeoSmart Information Ltd.

    Suite 9-11, 1st Floor,
    Old Bank Buildings,
    Bellstone, Shrewsbury,
    SY1 1HU

    Company No. 5475394

    Contact Us
    Call 01743 298100
    Email enquiries@geosmartinfo.co.uk
    Legal Links
    • Privacy Policy
    • CDM Regulations
    • Terms & Conditions
    Website by Ascendancy