01743 298100
info@geosmartinfo.co.uk
GeoSmart Information
  • Home
  • Reports
    • Contaminated Land Reports
    • Flood Risk Assessments
    • Sustainable Drainage Reports
    • NEW Detailed Drainage Design
  • Data
    • Groundwater Flood Risk Map
    • SuDS Infiltration Map
    • BGS Geology Datasets
    • User Guides
  • Services
    • GWFlood
    • GWSewerFlood
    • Flood Risk Portfolio
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Contaminated Land
    • Flood Risk Assessment
    • Sustainable Drainage Systems
    • Groundwater Flood Risk
    • CPD
    • Videos
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
    • Library
    • Case Studies
    • Latest GeoSmart e-Newsletters
  • About
    • Our Customers
    • Our Team
    • Our Partnerships
    • Testimonials
    • Careers
    • Our Responsibility
    • A Sustainable Future
    • FAQs
  • Contact

Environmental Audit Committee Report: More Sustainable, long term strategy needed by Government

Posted on July 4th 2016 in Blog, Flooding

Largely unnoticed thanks to a media dominated by the EU Referendum, The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) has published a report finding that the Government is failing to protect communities at risk of flooding.

The Government’s National Flood Resilience Review was launched following the flooding in December 2015. The EAC’s report aims to inform this Review. We summarise the key concluding points from the committee meeting held as the report was published (June 2016).

Funding and condition of flood defences

Over the last 20 years there has been a review following every major flooding event and this year is no exception. This repetitive cycle suggests that there has been a lack of effective long-term strategic planning about how to manage flood risk.

The report stresses that the Government could do more to mitigate the future risk of flooding. Importantly, the Government appears to be reactive rather than proactive.

The Committee found that funding fluctuates year-on-year. During the last Parliament funding was initially cut and only increased after the winter 2013/2014 floods. The Committee also found that the condition of critical flood defences were in decline.

The Worsfold Review was conducted by Mark Worsfold, Chief Engineer at Ofwat. It looked at the maintenance of the Environment Agency’s flood and coastal risk management (FCRM) assets.

As the money required to maintain these defences was cut, the number of defences which met the Environment Agency’s required condition also declined.

Planning policy

While there is national policy in place to plan for flood prevention, the number of local flood plans and strategies under the NPPF is worryingly low and the Government does not seem to be supporting local authorities to develop them.

The Committee is concerned that the Government does not know how prepared local authorities are for mitigating future flood events or whether their flood plans (if they have them) are fit for purpose. The extent to which the Environment Agency’s advice on whether, or how, to build in high flood-risk areas, is not systematically monitored, reported or followed up through the planning system.

Committee Chair, Mary Creagh MP said: “Local Authorities are not receiving the support they need to prepare for, and mitigate, the impacts of flooding.”

Resilience

The Committee found that infrastructure companies are adopting varying degrees of flood preparedness. For public confidence, infrastructure companies should be mandated to report their target flood resilience level, why this target is appropriate and what progress they are making to achieve it.

The MPs were disappointed by the lack of transparency demonstrated by the Government’s failure to publish the results of past reviews and to track in an open way how it has implemented them. The Committee recommends that the Government produce an annual national flood resilience review accompanied by an action plan. It suggested that the Government’s current National Flood Resilience Review would be a good place to start.

Sustainable drainage

Sustainable urban drainage systems (SuDS), such as rainwater capture and storage, are widely acknowledged to be an efficient way of dealing with surface water. But successive Governments have been reluctant to commence the legal powers that would make such systems the default option in new developments. The often cited reason is cost to developers.

Developers may pass those costs on to house buyers, a concern that again should not be ignored. But the longer-term costs, directly or from increased insurance premiums, of paying to repair houses and clean up local areas can be expected to outweigh short-term expense.

The Government blocked Lords amendments to the 2016 Housing Bill to remove mandatory sewer connection unless SuDS were part of the development. However, The Lords won the requirement for The Secretary of State to carry out a review of planning legislation and local planning policies concerning sustainable drainage in relation to the development of land in England, to be completed by Spring 2017.

The Committee questioned, nine years after the Pitt review recommendation that SuDS be the default option in new developments, why a further review was required. However, they recommend that it be completed at the latest in time for the Committee on Climate Change to use the findings in its 2017 progress report to Parliament.

More long term, holistic strategy needed

The committee concluded in scathing fashion over the Government’s inability to learn lessons and improve its long-term strategy in order to protect our communities and businesses into the future. They insisted that the Government needs to ensure that local plans and flood strategies are in place to ensure resilience. They also want to see a more balanced and sustainable approach to flood management, not just one built on ever larger flood defences moving the problem elsewhere.

Clearly, the focus and pressure for SuDS requirements on developers will not go away and guidance at planning level is now set on the rationale for implementing SuDS or not as part of the development. This will require developers and their planning consultant or architect to understand the site characteristics better in order to manage through applications effectively.

SuDSmart Reports, from GeoSmart, support lawyers, developers and regulators during the early stages of planning, evaluating appropriate drainage options for a Site.

For more information call us on 01743 298 100 or email info@geosmartinfo.co.uk.

Posted by DavidKempster
Share this Post
« Previous Post
Next Post »

Latest Articles

  • Increased Groundwater Flood Risk in England
  • CPD webinar: Environmental Information for Masterplanning – 7th April 2021
  • CPD webinar: Understanding SuDS – 24th March 2021
  • CPD webinar: Flood Risk Assessments: A Guide for Architects and Planners – 3rd March 2021
  • CPD webinar: Environmental Information for Masterplanning – 3rd February 2021

EnviroSmart Reports

View Contaminated Land Reports

FloodSmart Reports

View Flood Risk Assessments

SuDSmart Reports

View Sustainable Drainage Reports

See what our customers have to say...

"During the conveyancing process for my current house purchase, I was extremely concerned to find the general search results revealed the house was at 'moderate risk of groundwater flooding'. I was unable to get any further information from anyone until I contacted GeoSmart. The staff I spoke to were friendly, helpful, efficient and extremely knowledgeable. The information provided was very site specific and focused. The staff member who talked me through the information and maps provided was very knowledgeable, answered all my questions and allowed me plenty of time to discuss issues. Thanks to GeoSmart for their great service."
Linda Barton
"We were impressed by the speedy, well-informed service and personal contact that we received. The report was thorough and comprehensive. We will certainly use GeoSmart's services in the future"
Gregory Gray
Gregory Gray Associates
"I would like to say that dealing with GeoSmart was a seamless experience from beginning to end - thank you for that"
Martin Lloyd
Martin Lloyd Associates
"Everyone involved from initial approach to receipt of report was knowledgeable, efficient and focused"
Robert McCall
OeMO Ltd
"Great service! Extremely fast and the report was very detailed and well received by the planners. Many thanks GeoSmart, we will definitely use your services again"
Nigel Slack
Michael Eyres Partnership LLP
"The service was great, fast and efficient. Everyone we talked to was very helpful and the details were well received by the planners"
Ben Thorns
Solid Digital Marketing Ltd
"The service for a Phase 1 Contaminated Land Study was excellent, fast and efficient! GeoSmart were willing to assist despite the extremely tight timescale to work with. We will definitely consider using your services again"
Craig Roberts
Hunter Page
"Efficient and friendly service, GeoSmart provided a clear and concise report within the timescales advised. Great service and I would have no problem recommending"
Geraint Harris
Vitec Consult
"We are very pleased with the service provided by GeoSmart. Their reports have been used to assist with numerous planning applications and have always been delivered to budget and on-time, much to our clients’ appreciation. We look forward to working with GeoSmart on future projects"
Alan Gunne-Jones
Planning & Development Associates
"The service provided was efficient and friendly. From the first phone call to GeoSmart they provided a clear, professional approach to my request within the timescales advised. Great service and I would have no problem recommending"
John Childs
Private Developer
Find out more about how we can support you today!
Get in touch
Subscribe to our newsletter
© 2021 GeoSmart Information Ltd.

Suite 9-11, 1st Floor,
Old Bank Buildings,
Bellstone, Shrewsbury,
SY1 1HU

Company No. 5475394

Contact Us
Call 01743 298100
Email info@geosmartinfo.co.uk
Legal Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • CDM Regulations
  • Terms & Conditions
Website by Ascendancy Internet Marketing