01743 298100
enquiries@geosmartinfo.co.uk
GeoSmart Information
  • Home
  • Reports
    • Contaminated Land Reports
    • Flood Risk Assessments
    • Sustainable Drainage Reports
    • Detailed Drainage Design
  • Data & Services
    • Groundwater Flood Risk Map
    • SuDS Infiltration Map
    • BGS Geology Datasets
    • User Guides
    • GWFlood
    • GWSewerFlood
    • Flood Risk Portfolio
  • Risk
    • FloodSmart Analytics
    • Case Studies
    • News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Contaminated Land
    • Flood Risk Assessment
    • Sustainable Drainage Systems
    • Groundwater Flood Risk
    • CPD
    • Videos
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
    • Library
    • Case Studies
    • Latest GeoSmart e-Newsletters
  • About
    • Our Customers
    • Our Team
    • Our Partnerships
    • Testimonials
    • Careers
    • Our Responsibility
    • A Sustainable Future
    • FAQs
  • Contact

SuDS: Understanding the Cost Benefits

Posted on June 5th 2019 in Blog, Featured, News, Property

Developers and their architect/planning consultant partners can use SuDS to engage multiple stakeholders and to support the business case to partnership fund SuDS delivery and maintenance. Understanding which sites derive the greatest cost benefit is critical to developers so that their inclusion makes economic sense.

A recent study commissioned by DEFRA provided an evidence base for drainage design and operation costs. A WSP-led consortium compared New Build Sewers Under Different Conditions and Standards and Increasing the Uptake of Sustainable Drainage Systems in New Developments.

The aim was to provide costs associated with the construction and operation of drainage systems for three typical residential developments based on the three standards; the Building Regulations, Sewers for Adoption and the new SuDS Standards.

Three pilot sites were assessed, based on real locations, comprising 8 dwellings (small site), 32 dwellings (medium site) and 210 dwellings (large site).

Key Survey Findings

  • SuDS provide greater cost benefits on larger sites, less for small sites.
  • SuDS have a very great advantage on permeable catchments where rainfall runoff can be infiltrated compared to the drainage designs based on the other Standards.
  • On “impermeable” pilot sites, where some degree of infiltration was available for very small rainfall events, permeable pavements were advantageous over the other Standards.
  • Permeable pavements avoid large land take issues related to the use of vegetative systems.
  • SuDS have little cost advantage for medium and large sites where ground conditions require lining (high groundwater, contaminated soils, soil strength), and small sites are likely to be significantly more expensive. This is primarily due to the additional SuDS components that are needed to meet design criteria on both interception and treatment.
  • Infiltration trenches and rainwater garden features are the least cost effective for meeting Interception criterion in addressing runoff from roofs if permeable pavements are lined.
  • Sites that have slightly larger rainfall storage requirements will tend to favour SuDS schemes – more so in the South West and North East of the country, less so in the South East
  • SuDS work well for flat sites, but on steep sites they tend to constrain site layout and may cost more than drainage schemes designed using the other Standards.
  • The approach to SuDS design is a major factor and has a large impact on the cost and affordability of the SuDS scheme.

Maintenance Costs

WSP estimated annual average maintenance costs of 0.5% of capital costs of drainage construction. This indicates a whole life cost (WLC) approach to SuDS would focus on capital costs.

This figure is an average and will be more for situations when a liner is needed (to protect the groundwater or due to soil contamination), or when the soil is totally impermeable such as with blue London clay.

WLC is a troublesome calculation as there are 3 different sets of stakeholders – each with their own cost interest;

  • the capital cost is incurred by the developer
  • SuDS in the public realm will be owned by the Local Authority
  • SuDS in private property will be owned by these individuals.

There is generally little difference in maintenance costs between traditional drainage and the use of SuDS, though this is dependent on the type of SuDS used. The maintenance frequency for de-silting structures is a key determinant.

Although permeable pavements are becoming common-place for infiltration close to properties, not all Local Authorities have been prepared to adopt them or use them in certain road categories.

 width=

Case Study – Elvetham Park, Hampshire

Elvetham Heath storage pond – Image courtesy of Susdrain

This estate was completed in 2008 across 63ha offering 1,868 housing units and ancillary services including a school, village centre, retail outlets and sports pitches.

Elvetham Heath storage pond – Image courtesy of Susdrain

The primary drainage strategy was to use soakaway systems on higher ground (30% of the land area), therefore deeper groundwater storage capacity. For the remainder, Swales and linear ponds were used on the flattest parts of the site, while detention basins were scattered throughout the site to provide some attenuation. Stormwater pipework was used to connect the majority of residential and commercial units to a retention pond upstream from a nature reserve.

 width=

The SuDS management train works by runoff discharging into the swales, detention basins and then into a retention pond which forms part of a public park. It functions to a 50 year return period Greenfield rate of 7 litres per second per hectare, with no flooding within a 30 year return period.

Since the estate was completed, analysis by Susdrain has shown a 10% increase in property value for those properties in the vicinity of the SuDS components.

This response demonstrates the benefit to both residents but also to developers in terms of the marketing message to selling properties closest to these features.

From a commercial perspective, this helps to add either a premium to first sale prices and to prospective buyers on the capital growth benefit. This sale premium can also help mitigate the initial and maintenance costs of the SuDS.

In this case, the developer also benefited from Thames Water adopting a third of the SuDS scheme. They also had to pay Hart District Council £500,000 for the maintenance of vegetative aspects of the scheme.

Fitting the right SuDS to the Site

SuDS have a strong cost benefit across larger developments in areas where infiltration is most suitable, but there are other low-cost options in smaller schemes. Understanding the site,  its drainage profile and capacity and the appropriate SuDS scheme design are therefore critical as part of the master planning response to Local Authority requirements.

GeoSmart’s highly experienced consultants can develop a bespoke combination of contaminated land risk assessment, flood risk assessment and a drainage strategy for the Site. This will inform the best land management strategy to discharge planning conditions on contaminated land, flooding and drainage.

We are also able to offer more detailed run off calculations and offer preliminary SuDS designs based on the site’s unique characteristics.

For more information, call us on 01743 298 100 or email enquiries@geosmartinfo.co.uk.

Posted by Lily
Share this Post
« Previous Post
Next Post »

Contact Us

  • Please choose the product(s) you would like further information on.
  • If possible please give as much information about your site / property as you can and attach a site plan if available. This will enable us to provide you with the best assistance.
  • (If available)
  • Please upload your file in PDF format. (Max 4MB)
    Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: pdf, Max. file size: 4 MB.
    • Hidden
    • Hidden

    See what our customers have to say...

    "During the conveyancing process for my current house purchase, I was extremely concerned to find the general search results revealed the house was at 'moderate risk of groundwater flooding'. I was unable to get any further information from anyone until I contacted GeoSmart. The staff I spoke to were friendly, helpful, efficient and extremely knowledgeable. The information provided was very site specific and focused. The staff member who talked me through the information and maps provided was very knowledgeable, answered all my questions and allowed me plenty of time to discuss issues. Thanks to GeoSmart for their great service."
    Linda Barton
    "We were impressed by the speedy, well-informed service and personal contact that we received. The report was thorough and comprehensive. We will certainly use GeoSmart's services in the future"
    Gregory Gray
    Gregory Gray Associates
    "I would like to say that dealing with GeoSmart was a seamless experience from beginning to end - thank you for that"
    Martin Lloyd
    Martin Lloyd Associates
    "Everyone involved from initial approach to receipt of report was knowledgeable, efficient and focused"
    Robert McCall
    OeMO Ltd
    "Great service! Extremely fast and the report was very detailed and well received by the planners. Many thanks GeoSmart, we will definitely use your services again"
    Nigel Slack
    Michael Eyres Partnership LLP
    "The service was great, fast and efficient. Everyone we talked to was very helpful and the details were well received by the planners"
    Ben Thorns
    Solid Digital Marketing Ltd
    "The service for a Phase 1 Contaminated Land Study was excellent, fast and efficient! GeoSmart were willing to assist despite the extremely tight timescale to work with. We will definitely consider using your services again"
    Craig Roberts
    Hunter Page
    "Efficient and friendly service, GeoSmart provided a clear and concise report within the timescales advised. Great service and I would have no problem recommending"
    Geraint Harris
    Vitec Consult
    "We are very pleased with the service provided by GeoSmart. Their reports have been used to assist with numerous planning applications and have always been delivered to budget and on-time, much to our clients’ appreciation. We look forward to working with GeoSmart on future projects"
    Alan Gunne-Jones
    Planning & Development Associates
    "The service provided was efficient and friendly. From the first phone call to GeoSmart they provided a clear, professional approach to my request within the timescales advised. Great service and I would have no problem recommending"
    John Childs
    Private Developer
    Find out more about how we can support you today!
    Get in touch
    Subscribe to our newsletter
    © 2022 GeoSmart Information Ltd.

    Suite 9-11, 1st Floor,
    Old Bank Buildings,
    Bellstone, Shrewsbury,
    SY1 1HU

    Company No. 5475394

    Contact Us
    Call 01743 298100
    Email enquiries@geosmartinfo.co.uk
    Legal Links
    • Privacy Policy
    • CDM Regulations
    • Terms & Conditions
    Website by Ascendancy