
Sequential and Exceptions Test
Insights from the ground up.
Sequential and Exceptions Tests to meet planning application requirements, including Planning Consultancy input.
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot


Sequential and Exceptions Tests to meet planning application requirements, including Planning Consultancy input.
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot


To undertake a Sequential Test, negotiation with the Environment Agency (EA) and/or the Local Authority will be required. In summary the report should:
In line with paragraph 163 of the NPPF (2021), if following the application of the sequential test, it is not possible for the development to be in Flood Zones with a lower probability of flooding, the Exception Test can be applied.
The exception test consists of two components; demonstrating that flood risk can be managed for the lifetime of the development, and consideration of the wider sustainability benefits to the community that outweigh flood risk.
Environmental reports provided.
UK property transactions used GeoSmart data.
Value of properties advised on flood risk

* pricing based on site size, location & complexity
Navigating environmental reports can be complex. We’ve answered the most common queries about our data, timescales, and planning suitability below.
Can’t find the answer? Our consultancy team is here to help.
Yes, a flood risk Sequential Test is not usually required:
Yes, a Flood Risk Assessment will need to be carried out, ideally prior to the Sequential Test, so you can demonstrate that the development will be safe for its lifetime taking account of the vulnerability of its users, without increasing flood risk elsewhere, and, where possible, reducing flood risk overall.
There is no requirement for the person who carries out a flood risk sequential test to hold a particular qualification, however you will often find they are carried out by those who have significant knowledge in flood risk, such as an environmental consultant at GeoSmart.
No, there is no requirement to visit the site, as data and information can be obtained remotely.
A development proposal will only fail to pass the sequential test if alternative sites are identified within the search area that are at lower risk of flooding, appropriate for the proposed development and are ‘reasonably available’ for development. A site is only considered to be reasonably available if it is both ‘deliverable’ and ‘developable’ as defined by the NPPF.
If there are no potential alternative development locations at a lower flood risk than the subject site, then the site and proposed development is considered to have passed the Sequential Test, but requires application of the Exception Test.
At GeoSmart, we can usually produce a Sequential and Exceptions Test report within 6 weeks from payment and completion/receipt of the Site’s flood risk assessment. This also allows feedback from our chosen Planning Consultancy.
Browse our catalogue of white papers, technical guidance notes, and recorded CPD sessions. Each resource is available for individual download.